<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pinnock on inerrancy: it&#039;s not biblical&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patmccullough.com/2006/10/29/pinnock-on-inerrancy-its-not-biblical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patmccullough.com/2006/10/29/pinnock-on-inerrancy-its-not-biblical/</link>
	<description>a blog exploring Christian origins, biblical studies, social/cultural history, method, education and the journey through academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NT Wrong Has Fun With Labels &#171; kata ta biblia</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2006/10/29/pinnock-on-inerrancy-its-not-biblical/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>NT Wrong Has Fun With Labels &#171; kata ta biblia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pgmccullough.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/pinnock-on-inerrancy-its-not-biblical/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] searching (the link is the actual search someone used today) for posts about inspiration, such as this one and this one. Both of those posts are from 2006 and were viewed today by one person, presumably NT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] searching (the link is the actual search someone used today) for posts about inspiration, such as this one and this one. Both of those posts are from 2006 and were viewed today by one person, presumably NT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick George McCullough</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2006/10/29/pinnock-on-inerrancy-its-not-biblical/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick George McCullough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pgmccullough.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/pinnock-on-inerrancy-its-not-biblical/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>You know, Matt, I think it really messes people up who &lt;i&gt;aren&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; fundamentalists, too. I know a lot of people who are former fundies or just anti-fundie. Since fundamentalists are sooo devoted to the Bible, the anti-fundies can react negatively to doing &quot;Bible studies.&quot; It&#039;s like the more &quot;liberal&quot; Christians or the &lt;i&gt;less&lt;/i&gt; &quot;conservative&quot; Christians  are just letting the fundamentalists have the Bible, like studying the Bible is a &quot;fundamentalist thing.&quot; It&#039;s very unfortunate. I mention this because I&#039;ve been thinking about it lately... it&#039;s an issue at my church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Matt, I think it really messes people up who <i>aren&#8217;t</i> fundamentalists, too. I know a lot of people who are former fundies or just anti-fundie. Since fundamentalists are sooo devoted to the Bible, the anti-fundies can react negatively to doing &#8220;Bible studies.&#8221; It&#8217;s like the more &#8220;liberal&#8221; Christians or the <i>less</i> &#8220;conservative&#8221; Christians  are just letting the fundamentalists have the Bible, like studying the Bible is a &#8220;fundamentalist thing.&#8221; It&#8217;s very unfortunate. I mention this because I&#8217;ve been thinking about it lately&#8230; it&#8217;s an issue at my church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

