kata ta biblia

a blog exploring Christian origins, biblical studies, social/cultural history, method, education and the journey through academia

Messiah College's bad press lately

Lesson: Don’t judge an entire academic institution based on the actions of one of its alumni. At the same time, don’t pass immediate judgment on an alumna because of your assumptions about Christian colleges.

Let me be clear from the start, in no way do I want to support the actions of the Attorney General and the Bush administration in this whole firing fiasco. But in the coverage of the story, particularly in regard to Monica Goodling (whom you may know as that woman that plead the fifth when called to testify), has revealed once again how we all can come too quickly to easy conclusions through lazy assumptions. The short story is that Monica Goodling was the director of public affairs for the Department of Justice and had some kind of role in the 2006 U.S. attorney firings controversy. When called to testify, she decided to plead the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

So, naturally, people wondered who this Monica Goodling person was and they saw that she went to Regent University (Pat Robertson’s school) and some school called Messiah College. Well, the assumption seems to go, she must be one of these “religious right” folks and Messiah must be a “religious right” school too. One editorial article actually described the two schools as “fundamentalist Messiah College and evangelical Regent University created by TV preacher Pat Robertson.” Now, there’s an interesting twist: apparently Messiah is more conservative than Regent University. A Washington Post article describes the character of Messiah simply by informing the reader “that [it] does not have co-ed dorms or allow alcohol on campus.” Elsewhere, I’ve heard that people have picked up on Messiah’s Community Covenant, which talks about the prohibition of “alcoholic beverages,” while it also condemns “greed, jealousy, pride” and other things. This is used to point out that Christians are a bunch of hypocrites. That’s not headline news, whether or not it’s true in this case. The regulations about alcohol are debated, however, not just amongst the students, but faculty and administration as well.

One syndicated article merely states that Messiah College is “committed to embracing an evangelical spirit,” which is actually a misquotation and should be “committed to an embracing evangelical spirit.” Big difference in word order there. The quote comes from the school’s “Identity and Mission” statement, which you find by simply clicking on “About Messiah” on the homepage. What they left out was the rest of the sentence:

The College is committed to an embracing evangelical spirit rooted in the Anabaptist, Pietist and Wesleyan traditions of the Christian Church.

Granted, if the press used words like “Anabaptist, Pietist and Wesleyan traditions” then they would have to define these things for their audience. But Messiah has distinguished themselves from other types of evangelicalism by these traditions. If members of the press (or bloggers or whoever else is declaring an opinion on Messiah) knew what those traditions were and how they are embodied at Messiah College, they might be surprised. Furthermore, they ignored the more important following sentence in the statement (and this is a sentence that I have memorized):

Our mission is to educate men and women toward maturity of intellect, character and Christian faith in preparation for lives of service, leadership and reconciliation in church and society.

The bad press also has not latched onto one of the slogans of the school: “Unapologetically Christian, Rigorously Academic.” The first phrase would be great fodder for snide comments, and yet the second phrase doesn’t fit the characterization of a Christian school as not truly academic. Never mind that Messiah College was ranked by U.S. News & World Report as number four in its “Best Colleges” for comprehensive bachelor’s colleges in the North in 2007.

Whether the press explicitly states that they view Messiah College as a fundamentalist institution or whether they describe it in a tone that implies as much, they have not done their homework. A fundamentalist school does not have a woman as its president, as does Messiah College, one school out of a mere 23% of all college presidencies in 2006. A fundamentalist school does not allow “Equality Ride,” a gay rights protest bus, on campus and allow students to discuss the pros and cons of gay rights in a reasonable way. A fundamentalist school does not put on controversial plays and art shows. They do not invite people like progressive Christian leader Jim Wallis, Gary Haugen of International Justice Mission, The Color of Water author James McBride, Naomi Tutu, and Senior NPR Correspondent Juan Williams on campus as speakers (and those are just the ones off the top of my head). They do not have an entire center dedicated to “Service and Leaning” and take on the challenge of serving the social needs of a local city.

A fundamentalist school does have a statement of faith which affirms “inerrancy” of the Bible and denounces evolution in favor of “creationism.” These things are not to be found in the statements of Messiah College. Will you find students who believe these things? No doubt. The student body is generally more conservative than faculty and administration, in my estimation (though the students do have College Democrats as well as Republicans, mind you). I came into Messiah as a fundamentalist myself, but was one no longer after my first semester of classes. If you want to get an idea about Messiah College, check out the things discussed in the student newspaper or the Alumni and Parent magazine (the most recent issue is dedicated to environmental concerns). Read the latest news of activities on campus. In response to all this press coverage, Messiah’s President, Kim Phipps made this statement released yesterday (4/3/07):

Statement to Messiah College Employees and Alumni re: Recent Media Coverage

In recent weeks there has been local and national media interest in Messiah College . The reporting, unfortunately, has often been inaccurate and misleading. In connection with the media coverage of alumnae Monica Goodling, and other recent stories, Messiah College specifically, and Christian higher education in general, has been mischaracterized by many media outlets and blogs, either directly or through innuendo, as substandard in academic quality and narrow in its breadth and diversity of thought.

This has occurred in spite of the fact that College administrators and faculty have worked diligently with reporters to provide accurate, contextual information about Messiah, our mission, our academic quality, and the caliber of our faculty, students, and graduates. As an administrative team, we are being equally diligent in our efforts to correct this misinformation and set the record straight with our colleagues in the media who have inaccurately portrayed Messiah College . Recent events have affirmed my resolve that a continued priority for the Colle
ge must be to increase visibility and awareness of Messiah’s education distinctives to a broader regional and national audience.

I am honored to be the president of an outstanding academic institution such as Messiah College . Our students are intelligent, gifted leaders who are compelled by their Christian faith to make a difference in our world through the use of their God-given intellect, talents, and abilities. Our educators, administrators, and staff are dedicated scholars and accomplished professionals, committed to supporting students in their educational experience. And our graduates exemplify service, leadership, and reconciliation, by the meaningful contributions they offer in all the areas of contemporary culture and society, both in the United States and around the globe.

Thank you for the role that you fulfill in the Messiah College community and for your commitment to our common mission.

Kim S. Phipps
President

Finally, I’d like to say that based on news coverage on Monica Goodling alone, I had a very negative impression. I was thinking along with everyone else: She took the fifth?! That doesn’t look good. But then when I saw Messiah College blasted and indirectly associated with Pat Robertson (since she went to his Regent University for law school), I realized just how quickly we pass judgments without knowledge. Dean Curry, professor of politics at Messiah, remembers Goodling and is quoted in Messiah’s student newspaper about her decision:

“It’s important to remember that [Goodling] hasn’t been charged with any crimes. This is all about politics,” said Curry. In Curry’s opinion, Goodling has pled the Fifth and chosen not to testify because “she feels that the environment in Washington is so politicized that she might open herself up to legal liability.”

Maybe we should try to give people the benefit of the doubt more often. Not that we know what she has or hasn’t done and why she has or hasn’t done it, but maybe we should just chill out a little bit. The political wars have their own collateral damage, and in this case that happened to be the reputation of a fine academic institution.

Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Google Buzz Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

« Previous post
  • Shawn

    WOW! I had no idea this was occurring, Pat. It went totally under my radar. Hmmm …

    I’m not surprised that people who aren’t aware of Messiah’s BIC and Anabaptist heritage (or the Radical Reformation, for that matter) would lump it into a purely Evangelical category. It’s a shame, to say the least.

    Great post, BTW.

  • Qui

    Thanks so much for this informed analysis of what’s happening.

    As a Messiah Alum living/working in DC, I’m intrigued to see how this pans out. I also work in PR/social media, and therefore extremely interested in what kind of buzz this generates for the school. Sometimes a little controversy is good for the soul =)

  • Patrick George McCullough

    Amen, Shawn. It cracks me up that that article quotes Messiah as saying it is committed to “embracing an evangelical spirit.” What does that even mean? “We want to give Evangelicals a big old hug.” Furthermore, being at a truly self-described Evangelical institution now (Fuller Seminary), I have to say that not all forms of Evangelicalism are the devil! Many Evangelicals are doing great things in society, things that secular liberals would get into.

    Thanks, Qui. I think you may be right. This really gives Messiah the opportunity to step up and let society know what it stands for and why. If people get a hold of the right information, maybe Messiah can come out on the other end in a positive light. One fear that I would have is that the negative coverage of Messiah as a fundamentalist school actually attracts fundamentalist students to go there. Although, if they’re converted like me, I guess that’s a good thing :)

  • Talatu-Carmen

    I am SO thrilled to find this balanced rebuttal after wallowing through all the uninformed blog articles (I found ones that claimed Pat Robertson founded Messiah etc.) about Monica Goodling. I went to Messiah too, and, like you, I came out much more “liberal” than I came in. Thanks so much for writing this.

  • Patrick George McCullough

    Thanks for your comment Tulatu-Carmen, sorry for my delay in response!

    I believe I saw the same claim about Robertson founding Messiah. Last I heard, Robertson wasn’t around in 1906, chumming it up with a bunch of Brethren in Christ folk ;)

    Take care. I hope that your dissertation defense goes/went well [saw it on your blog].

  • Patrick George McCullough

    I have deleted a few comments from this posting as I felt they were not related to the topic at hand. One person suggested that Messiah was not a Christian school because it did not believe in inerrancy or creationism. I felt his tone was a little hostile, so in turn I responded to him explaining that a school need not believe in inerrancy to be Christian. But I also took a jab at his own blog, which was, well, not Christian of me. Furthermore, I had only scanned his blog, so I misrepresented the blog in an unfairly negative light. His subsequent comment brought this to my attention.

    After debating with myself about what to do about this, I feel it necessary to remove the conversation as it was a distraction from the topic at hand and I do not think it fair for misinformation to remain published here. I also felt it disingenuous to simply remove it without explanation or apology. So I would like to apologize and I hope the blogger in question can forgive me for my poor actions in the heat of the moment. I am guilty of the very same thing I have accused of others: “how quickly we pass judgments without knowledge” and “come too quickly to easy conclusions through lazy assumptions.”

  • healtheland

    Patrick George McCullough:

    Apology accepted. It was not so much a hostile barb as it was a challenge to a respectful theological; and a challenge that I actually do hope will be met. I would allow you to choose the forum and set the ground rules. Thank you. http://healtheland.wordpress.com

  • healtheland

    My comment should have read: “It was not intended to be a barb -though in retrospect I can see how it could have been construed as such since many have told me that my manners need improving and all those people absolutely cannot be wrong – as it was a challenge to a respectful theological debate” or something after that fashion. Again. Thank you.

  • Patrick George McCullough

    Thanks, healtheland. I would love to get into the inerrancy debate. It’s something I hope to do in the future. Unfortunately, I have a lot on my plate right now and would not be able to do it justice. I would recommend a book entitled Evangelicals & Scripture: Tradition, Authority and Hermeneutics edited by Bacote, Miguelez, and Okholm. I found it to be a helpful exploration of viewing Scripture from a clearly “evangelical” point of view without an inerrantist position.

  • Stephen

    Hey I’m a sophomore at Messiah right now and I too was surprised at 1.The fact that Monica was from Messiah (and being a politics major myself, in a way, it gave me some hope that Messiah grads can get somewhere in politics) 2.The ridiculous media coverage of Messiah, though I found it more humorous than anything.

    Also I don’t disagree with her taking the fifth after what just happened to Libby. It really shouldn’t be much of a surprise considering the atmosphere in Washington as Prof. Curry pointed out. Although when you invoke the fifth amendment people automatically assume you must have done something wrong. It seems that her invoking the fifth doesn’t have all that much to do with the actual firings but rather the confusion in the aftermath. After all firing attorneys is legal for almost any reason. And there is absolutely no evidence or even a credible that the attorneys were fired while prosecuting republicans for corruption or things of that nature. This whole mess is really just a political dog show.

    Also please don’t take the student newspaper on campus as representing even a large percentage of students beliefs. It just doesn’t…

  • Patrick George McCullough

    More power to you, Stephen. I can’t imagine going into politics. I can’t stand any of the parties. I’m usually more sympathetic to Democrats, but really, they’re doing the same thing that they accuse the Attorney General of: politics. You’re right; it’s a political dog show. Honestly, sometimes I feel like it’s all a political dog show.

    On the student newspaper… if you find your way back here, would you care to elaborate on your feelings about the student newspaper? Is it too liberal for your tastes? Too conservative? Focuses on irrelevant issues? Gives inaccurate coverage?

    Thanks!

  • Steve in St. Pete

    I graduated from Messiah in 1979. Although official attitudes regarding personal morality were narrow, many students and staff remained supportive of traditional anabaptist/weslyan values including peacemaking, working for social justice, and challenging secular politics when disquised as Christian faith. Few would have even considered going to any institution related to either Pat Robertson or Jerry Fallwell. During the 80′s and 90′s, I became very concerned that the college was turning away from those values. If Messiah had continued to espouse those important anabaptist/weslyan values, we might be hearing very different stories from the media concerning Messiah and her graduates. Better late than never, a welcome change seems to be occuring under the new leadership of President Phipps.

  • Betty

    this is an unexpected web-surfing encounter! i was looking for chapel lyrics to the african songs that were sung on campus while i was a student there, simply because i miss them very much! ironically, i am also at fuller (and really should be studying for finals at the moment.

    seeing that i graduated about a year ago, i am going to reason that my views on the college are fairly accurate…of course, it is important to remember that perspective always varies. i apologize now, for my random little thoughts, my mind is a bit tired.

    the paper: my personal take is that it has moved progressively downhill in recent years. something amusing to read to pass the time, but not of great depth and academic caliber. it does balance conservative and liberal views by offering both.

    i agree with someone’s earlier note that the student body is more conservative than the faculty.

    wikepedia actually offers a pretty acurate take on the school… i wonder why the press didn’t just go with that.

    on the anabapist/wesleyan values that steve from st. pete touches on, the student body DOES in fact still care very much about peacemaking, working for justice- (i don’t know much about politics, but i would still contend that it is a pretty important and spoken about subject.) students meet in groups with and without professors to speak about these matters.

    the college, since kim phipps has taken on a vision of community and the college atmosphere, i feel, is very open to discussion on all of the issues that we deal with in this life, this world.

    i realize that i has been about 2 months that this discussion began…don’t feel like you need to respond! perhaps we need to have a messiah get together soon! i have been coming across a bunch of us.

  • Patrick George McCullough

    Wow! Thanks for the thoughtful and helpful response, Betty. I won’t linger, since I, too, am studying for finals :) but it is nice to get such depth in comments, even if it is an older conversation. I referred back to it recently anyway.

    Well, feel free to look me up on campus. My email address is a link in the “About kata ta biblia” section.

    Peace,
    Pat

  • http://patmccullough.com/2007/05/29/messiah-college-on-the-daily-show-more-goodling/ Messiah College on The Daily Show: More Goodling « kata ta biblia

    [...] bringing Messiah’s name into the news for all the wrong reasons (not to mention how awfully misconstrued the bad press has been). Stewart’s line: Here she is swearing in on the Bible, which is kind of redundant for a [...]

  • http://patmccullough.com/2008/07/31/the-daily-show-mentions-messiah-college-again/ The Daily Show mentions Messiah College, again « kata ta biblia

    [...] going to repeat what I said during the bad press about [...]

  • http://patmccullough.com/2007/06/12/richard-t-hughes-defends-messiah-and-christian-colleges-in-general/ Richard T. Hughes defends Messiah (and Christian colleges in general) « kata ta biblia

    [...] since Monica Goodling is an alumna of the school (as well as Regent University) [see my posts here and here]. It is an opinion piece written in the Philadelphia Inquirer and comes from a new faculty [...]