<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We need more umph in scholarly rhetoric&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patmccullough.com/2009/01/16/we-need-more-umph-in-scholarly-rhetoric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/01/16/we-need-more-umph-in-scholarly-rhetoric/</link>
	<description>a blog exploring Christian origins, biblical studies, social/cultural history, method, education and the journey through academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: slaveofone</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/01/16/we-need-more-umph-in-scholarly-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>slaveofone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=639#comment-733</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reading foundational essays in the field of &quot;Old Testament Theology&quot; or &quot;Biblical Theology&quot; by people such as Johann Gabler, Otto Eissfeldt, etc, and despite their keen observations, erudite scholarship, and what they were able to contribute to the advancement and progress of the discipline, I can only shake my head in astonishment at some of the utter foolishness that served as a foundation of this field... I feel this fun (albeit pejorative) declaration aptly fits most of these dead luminaries (i.e. black holes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reading foundational essays in the field of &#8220;Old Testament Theology&#8221; or &#8220;Biblical Theology&#8221; by people such as Johann Gabler, Otto Eissfeldt, etc, and despite their keen observations, erudite scholarship, and what they were able to contribute to the advancement and progress of the discipline, I can only shake my head in astonishment at some of the utter foolishness that served as a foundation of this field&#8230; I feel this fun (albeit pejorative) declaration aptly fits most of these dead luminaries (i.e. black holes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick George McCullough</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/01/16/we-need-more-umph-in-scholarly-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick George McCullough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=639#comment-732</guid>
		<description>Indeed! I&#039;m glad I&#039;m taking Latin now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed! I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m taking Latin now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hobbins</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/01/16/we-need-more-umph-in-scholarly-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hobbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 02:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=639#comment-731</guid>
		<description>This is where Latin comes in handy. Apparently it is all right to say some things in Latin that are to be avoided in the vernacular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is where Latin comes in handy. Apparently it is all right to say some things in Latin that are to be avoided in the vernacular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto Mann</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/01/16/we-need-more-umph-in-scholarly-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=639#comment-730</guid>
		<description>we DO need more umph!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we DO need more umph!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

