As I was searching the preliminary program book for the SBL Annual Meeting looking for interesting sessions, all of a sudden I reached a page saying, “The Preliminary Program is Not Yet Available.” Hmmm. It was linked on many blogs yesterday, so apparently the folks at SBL noticed the heightened traffic and shut it down. Was it a leak? Was some blogger experimenting with the website URL (it’s just the same as other program book websites with the meeting ID #15)? In fact, if you look back at the program books from previous years, the same message appears! “The Preliminary Program is Not Yet Available.”
An intriguing mystery! Perhaps not quite as scandalous as Amazon’s recent “Lesbian” tag mishap.
Update: Thanks to Jorwed for pointing out this updated post on the Evangelical Textual Criticism blog:
Update: I have removed the contents of this post including comments because Matthew Collins of the SBL asked me to do so. Apparently, the program book is not linked from any part of the SBL site and anyone who has announced the page has done so in error, since SBL has not announced it. I am very sorry for this, I got the link from another biblioblogger, and it was never my intention to do something offensive.
Hmmm. This gives me an ethical dilemma. Michael Collins has not contacted me to ask me to take down my post, but does this announcement ethically obligate me to do the same? My own post is not a list of many sessions, but a look into the people with whom I am presenting in only one session.
I’d rather not take it down, but I suppose I will say that if he contacts me and tells me that it is harmful in some way for me to leave my post up, then I will temporarily take it down. It’s not like SBL is some big corporate entity on an intimidation campaign. I have tremendous respect for the organization and have even served as a student representative for SBL. So, I will leave it at that for now.




