kata ta biblia

a blog exploring Christian origins, biblical studies, social/cultural history, method, education and the journey through academia

A James Revolution!

Pretty much every book or commentary–and most articles–on James highlight the fact that James is one of the most neglected books of the New Testament, relegated to that catch-all category, the “catholic epistles”. For most protestants, following Luther’s declaration about it being an “epistle of straw,” James takes a backseat to Paul. The Anabaptists seem to be one of the only Christian groups to really place an emphasis on James–though I’d be interested to look into how that plays out in the life and practice of actual communities. Well, it seems the scholarly community is catching up with what the Anabaptists have known all this time: James is an amazingly rich text, ripe for all sorts of reflection.

I would like to do some in-depth research on James this summer and have been requesting some James commentaries to review on my blog. I am excited about one of the most recent commentaries on James by seasoned Catholic New Testament scholar, Patrick J. Hartin, in the Sacra Pagina series (April 2009). I am also taking a look into Hartin’s older work, A Spirituality of Perfection (1999). Incidentally, I am reading through an essay of Hartin’s for my Monday seminary on Wisdom and Apocalyptic with Boustan: “Who Is Wise and Understanding among You? (James 3:13): An Analysis of Wisdom, Eschatology, and Apocalypticism in the Letter of James,” in Conflicted Boundaries in Wisdom and Apocalypticism (2005) edited by Benjamin Wright and Lawrence Wills (a collection of papers given for the Wisdom and Apocalypticism SBL group). Also from that collection, Patrick Tiller’s “The Rich and Poor in James: An Apocalyptic Ethic.” All these Patricks interested in James! :)

Testifying to the new interest in James, Abby Cox of T & T Clark was quite generous in sending along a collection of essays edited by Robert Webb and John Kloppenborg, Reading James With New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of James (2007)–part of a series looking into new methods of reading those neglected New Testament epistles. From what I am assuming will be a much different perspective, Chris Fann of Zondervan is sending out the James volume (2008) in the newer Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament series, written by Craig L. Blomberg and Mariam J. Kamell.

But wait, there’s more! If Jeremy Pierce’s list is still accurate (commentary assignments shift fairly often, from what I understand), we are in for some real commentary treats on the letter of James. Upcoming commentators include John S. Kloppenborg (Hermeneia), Dale Allison (ICC replacement), Joel Green (New Testament Library), Scot McKnight (NICNT replacement), A.K.M. Adam (Baylor Handbook on the Greek New Testament), John Painter (Paideia Commentaries on the New Testament), Wesley Hiram Wachob (Rhetoric of Religious Antiquity). The methodological diversity represented here is very exciting. If the names associated with these volumes is any indication, we are indeed in the midst a James revolution in biblical scholarship!

Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Google Buzz Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

  • http://www.thegoldenrule1.wordpress.com Mike Koke

    Looking forward to your further posts on James. I think the reason for the neglect of James is that people do not know how it relates to Paul’s view on justification or see it as just general Jewish/Hellenistic wisdom with only light Christian touches (James 1:1; 2:1; 5:7). I remember Richard Bauckham’s commentary on James had an interesting take but in a more conservative direction.

  • http://www.echoofeden.com slaveofone

    If I (also Anabaptist) were to focus on the NT, I’d spend most of my time with Matthew, John, Hebrews, 1 Peter, and the Odes of Solomon. Paul doesn’t interest me.