<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Round on the Dearth of Female Bibliobloggers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/01/another-round-on-the-dearth-of-female-bibliobloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/01/another-round-on-the-dearth-of-female-bibliobloggers/</link>
	<description>a blog exploring biblical studies and the journey through academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:47:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: New Meme Response: Top 5 Female Biblical Scholars &#171; Ecce Homo</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/01/another-round-on-the-dearth-of-female-bibliobloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>New Meme Response: Top 5 Female Biblical Scholars &#171; Ecce Homo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1274#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>[...] wrapped up in the quagmire surrounding female scholars in the biblioblogosphere (see  here,here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here), I will point out that I wish these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrapped up in the quagmire surrounding female scholars in the biblioblogosphere (see  here,here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here), I will point out that I wish these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Listening to Women&#8217;s Voices &#171; kata ta biblia</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/01/another-round-on-the-dearth-of-female-bibliobloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>Listening to Women&#8217;s Voices &#171; kata ta biblia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 00:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1274#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>[...] ~Sonja (but read Sue&#8217;s valid response) [Sonja&#039;s blog] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ~Sonja (but read Sue&#8217;s valid response) [Sonja&#39;s blog] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/01/another-round-on-the-dearth-of-female-bibliobloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1274#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We have a hard time being as focused as men. And men have a hard time reading all that “twaddle”&lt;/i&gt;

Is someone suggesting that men don&#039;t both post and read twaddle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We have a hard time being as focused as men. And men have a hard time reading all that “twaddle”</i></p>
<p>Is someone suggesting that men don&#8217;t both post and read twaddle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/01/another-round-on-the-dearth-of-female-bibliobloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 05:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1274#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, Patrick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, Patrick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonja</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/01/another-round-on-the-dearth-of-female-bibliobloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>sonja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1274#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>Hi Patrick ... I&#039;m late to this conversation for any number of reasons, life, mostly.  Which is, I think, one of the main reasons that there is such a dearth of female bibliobloggers out there.

It&#039;s just life happening.  Most women are multi-taskers and that shows in their blogs.  If you read my blog or Julie&#039;s or Makeesha&#039;s or any of women in my blog roll (listed under Galadriel on my blog) you&#039;ll find all kinds of different posts from theology to dinner to shopping to health care to breast feeding.  We have a hard time being as focused as men.  And men have a hard time reading all that &quot;twaddle&quot;.  They want some assurance about what&#039;s going to be at a given blog every day.  This is not a hard and fast rule by any means, but I think it is a general tendency which effects the way women blog and the way men read.  I don&#039;t think either way is good or bad or better ... it&#039;s just what is.  I read both and enjoy both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrick &#8230; I&#8217;m late to this conversation for any number of reasons, life, mostly.  Which is, I think, one of the main reasons that there is such a dearth of female bibliobloggers out there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just life happening.  Most women are multi-taskers and that shows in their blogs.  If you read my blog or Julie&#8217;s or Makeesha&#8217;s or any of women in my blog roll (listed under Galadriel on my blog) you&#8217;ll find all kinds of different posts from theology to dinner to shopping to health care to breast feeding.  We have a hard time being as focused as men.  And men have a hard time reading all that &#8220;twaddle&#8221;.  They want some assurance about what&#8217;s going to be at a given blog every day.  This is not a hard and fast rule by any means, but I think it is a general tendency which effects the way women blog and the way men read.  I don&#8217;t think either way is good or bad or better &#8230; it&#8217;s just what is.  I read both and enjoy both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/01/another-round-on-the-dearth-of-female-bibliobloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1058</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1274#comment-1058</guid>
		<description>I think I more or less agree with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I more or less agree with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emerging Women &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Where Are the Women Bloggers?</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/01/another-round-on-the-dearth-of-female-bibliobloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerging Women &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Where Are the Women Bloggers?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1274#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>[...] to relate to blogging in general and not the vast discrepancy in biblical studies specifically. I suggested that there may be a perceived risk to blogging which professionally academic women do not want to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to relate to blogging in general and not the vast discrepancy in biblical studies specifically. I suggested that there may be a perceived risk to blogging which professionally academic women do not want to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biblioblogging Women: Don&#8217;t Blame the Victim &#171; The Biblioblog Top 50</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/01/another-round-on-the-dearth-of-female-bibliobloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Biblioblogging Women: Don&#8217;t Blame the Victim &#171; The Biblioblog Top 50</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1274#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>[...] blanks in any way you deem appropriate. Again, these extremists are only the more visible tip of a complex religo-cultural problem, one for which we should resist the urge to simplify or essentialize with generalizing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blanks in any way you deem appropriate. Again, these extremists are only the more visible tip of a complex religo-cultural problem, one for which we should resist the urge to simplify or essentialize with generalizing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick George McCullough</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/01/another-round-on-the-dearth-of-female-bibliobloggers/comment-page-/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick George McCullough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1274#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>Thanks, BT50. I saw the response and appreciate the quote provided on &quot;margins.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, BT50. I saw the response and appreciate the quote provided on &#8220;margins.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. K. Gayle</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/01/another-round-on-the-dearth-of-female-bibliobloggers/comment-page-/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>J. K. Gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1274#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>&quot;I do think there&#039;s a dimension of blogging that requires a healthy dose of ego, something not traditionally encouraged in females.&quot;
--&lt;a href=&quot;http://forbiddengospels.blogspot.com/2009/09/gender-concerns-among-bloggers.html?showComment=1251896210923#c6804963822924634759&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Julia M. O&#039;Brien&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;blah. they dont blog because they dont want to. thats all.&quot;
--Jim, making Julia&#039;s point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I do think there&#8217;s a dimension of blogging that requires a healthy dose of ego, something not traditionally encouraged in females.&#8221;<br />
&#8211;<a href="http://forbiddengospels.blogspot.com/2009/09/gender-concerns-among-bloggers.html?showComment=1251896210923#c6804963822924634759" rel="nofollow">Julia M. O&#8217;Brien</a></p>
<p>&#8220;blah. they dont blog because they dont want to. thats all.&#8221;<br />
&#8211;Jim, making Julia&#8217;s point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
