<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Woman Who Blogs About Exegesis and Hermeneutics?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/05/a-woman-who-blogs-about-exegesis-and-hermeneutics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/05/a-woman-who-blogs-about-exegesis-and-hermeneutics/</link>
	<description>a blog exploring biblical studies and the journey through academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:26:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: I am #22 and You Can Too! &#171; kata ta biblia</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/05/a-woman-who-blogs-about-exegesis-and-hermeneutics/comment-page-1/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>I am #22 and You Can Too! &#171; kata ta biblia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 04:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1318#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>[...] appropriately for the past month, are female bibliobloggers: Suzanne at #21 and Rachel (for whom I advocated in the past month  ) at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appropriately for the past month, are female bibliobloggers: Suzanne at #21 and Rachel (for whom I advocated in the past month  ) at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesbradfordpate</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/05/a-woman-who-blogs-about-exegesis-and-hermeneutics/comment-page-1/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesbradfordpate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1318#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>Well, her &quot;Ode to Gordon Fee&quot; will get her a place on BryanL&#039;s blogroll!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, her &#8220;Ode to Gordon Fee&#8221; will get her a place on BryanL&#8217;s blogroll!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/05/a-woman-who-blogs-about-exegesis-and-hermeneutics/comment-page-1/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1318#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>I am glad that you have finally met Rachel. I have linked to her for quite a while now and some other women although not as many as I should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad that you have finally met Rachel. I have linked to her for quite a while now and some other women although not as many as I should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick George McCullough</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/05/a-woman-who-blogs-about-exegesis-and-hermeneutics/comment-page-/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick George McCullough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 02:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1318#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>Hi Rachel, Sorry to put you on the spot there! You just seemed like a great example of what I&#039;ve been talking about lately! :)

Believe me, people in the Top 50 do not necessarily know what their talking about! It&#039;s not about who knows the most or makes the best arguments. The Top 50 is simply a ranking of traffic volume in a given month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rachel, Sorry to put you on the spot there! You just seemed like a great example of what I&#8217;ve been talking about lately! <img src='http://patmccullough.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Believe me, people in the Top 50 do not necessarily know what their talking about! It&#8217;s not about who knows the most or makes the best arguments. The Top 50 is simply a ranking of traffic volume in a given month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/09/05/a-woman-who-blogs-about-exegesis-and-hermeneutics/comment-page-1/#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 19:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1318#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>This is rather embarrassing but thank you (I blush). I have read a lot about bibliobloggers, and particularly lately. I consider myself such a novice, though.

So is this what is happening do you think? Some of us, male and female are waiting for that time, which I don&#039;t think ever comes, when we finally feel like we might know what we&#039;re talking about and then we would be willing to be inspected for that honourable &#039;top fifty thing&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is rather embarrassing but thank you (I blush). I have read a lot about bibliobloggers, and particularly lately. I consider myself such a novice, though.</p>
<p>So is this what is happening do you think? Some of us, male and female are waiting for that time, which I don&#8217;t think ever comes, when we finally feel like we might know what we&#8217;re talking about and then we would be willing to be inspected for that honourable &#8216;top fifty thing&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
