<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul as Complicit in Empire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patmccullough.com/2009/11/04/paul-as-complicit-in-empire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/11/04/paul-as-complicit-in-empire/</link>
	<description>a blog exploring Christian origins, biblical studies, social/cultural history, method, education and the journey through academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/11/04/paul-as-complicit-in-empire/comment-page-1/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1498#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>In the slavery category: Harrill argues that Paul&#039;s slave metaphor in Rom 7 reinforces the Roman stereotype of slaves as useless and therefore worthy of abuse. Glancy argues similarly from the Hagar/Sarah allegory of Gal 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the slavery category: Harrill argues that Paul&#8217;s slave metaphor in Rom 7 reinforces the Roman stereotype of slaves as useless and therefore worthy of abuse. Glancy argues similarly from the Hagar/Sarah allegory of Gal 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick George McCullough</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/11/04/paul-as-complicit-in-empire/comment-page-/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick George McCullough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1498#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Greg. I&#039;m not saying that they&#039;re &lt;i&gt;good&lt;/i&gt; texts for the complicity argument. I&#039;m just trying to see what might be out there. At least one person suggested &quot;Anti-Judaism&quot; as a possible route for imperialistic thinking. From what I have read, some scholars have gone that route.

Do you have any texts to add to the list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Greg. I&#8217;m not saying that they&#8217;re <i>good</i> texts for the complicity argument. I&#8217;m just trying to see what might be out there. At least one person suggested &#8220;Anti-Judaism&#8221; as a possible route for imperialistic thinking. From what I have read, some scholars have gone that route.</p>
<p>Do you have any texts to add to the list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/11/04/paul-as-complicit-in-empire/comment-page-1/#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1498#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>Romans 13:1-7 is an obvious passage for this conversation, but the passages from 1 Corinthians all have notorious text/translation/interpretation problems.  How 1 Thess 2 bears on empire, I&#039;m not really sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romans 13:1-7 is an obvious passage for this conversation, but the passages from 1 Corinthians all have notorious text/translation/interpretation problems.  How 1 Thess 2 bears on empire, I&#8217;m not really sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Koke</title>
		<link>http://patmccullough.com/2009/11/04/paul-as-complicit-in-empire/comment-page-1/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Koke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patmccullough.com/?p=1498#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting exercise Pat.  I wonder where Philemon would fit into this: on the one hand Paul does not outright condemn slavery but sends the slave Onesimus back to his owner Philemon, but on the other hand Paul implicitly undermines the rationalle behind slavery when he encourages Philemon to receive Onesimus as a brother in Christ.  So do we see Philemon as an example of Paul as being complicit with the system of imperialism or undermining it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting exercise Pat.  I wonder where Philemon would fit into this: on the one hand Paul does not outright condemn slavery but sends the slave Onesimus back to his owner Philemon, but on the other hand Paul implicitly undermines the rationalle behind slavery when he encourages Philemon to receive Onesimus as a brother in Christ.  So do we see Philemon as an example of Paul as being complicit with the system of imperialism or undermining it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

