I like to tell my students that if their writing assignments argue that something is 100% certain, then they are probably wrong. I also tell them that we’re not just there to learn facts that they can regurgitate about the Bible or Western Civ or whatever the course topic. Rather, their papers and our class discussion is for critically engaged analysis. Discussions are meant to explore and question the meanings of things. This is basically my own philosophy–a propensity towards nuanced complexity that accepts no blanket assumptions, even (especially?) religious ones.
People who click on this “About Pat” page are surely looking to find a category for me. Is he conservative? Liberal? Moderate? Progressive? Fundamentalist? Radical? Calvinist? Arminian? Democrat? Republican? Coffee drinker? Tea drinker? I hope that I can remain mysterious enough so that you don’t automatically place me into a box. If you choose to be a dialogue partner with me on this blog, I will try to honor you by not putting you in a box. But, I will help you with a few descriptive details. I am currently a Ph.D. student in New Testament and Christian origins at UCLA (see more about that decision at this post), having received a M.Div. from Fuller Seminary and a B.A. in biblical studies from Messiah College. The program at UCLA is taught from the perspective of social and cultural history, which is the lens with which I view theology.
Working under Scott Bartchy and closely with Ra’anan Boustan, I am currently focused on studying apocalyptic discourse and social identity in early Judaism and the Jesus movement, an area perhaps influenced by my own search for hidden mysteries. I am an Anabaptist, a member of both the Mennonite Church (USA) and Brethren in Christ denominations. As an Anabaptist, I’m not particularly doctrinaire, but try to live my faith in service to others. My favorite meal is probably homemade macaroni and cheese, while my favorite dessert is banana cream cheesecake.
Making sure that I do not indulge too deeply in that last point, my amazing wife is a Registered Dietitian and Lactation Consultant (she takes the exam to become an IBCLC this summer) with a Master of Public Health from UCLA. Being much more grounded in the real world than I am, she works to provide nutritional counseling and breastfeeding support to low-income mothers. Together, we are parents to a beautiful (and fabulously challenging!) son, Declan, born in December of 2008.
You can contact me at: pgmccullough (AT) ucla (DOT) edu
About kata ta biblia
This is a blog exploring the New Testament, Christian origins, social and cultural history, and education from the perspective of an academic who happens to be an Anabaptist, while also discussing the strange journey through academia. The title is Greek and literally means “according to the books.” For me, it represents the journey to explore the meanings found within many “texts,” including but not limited to the New Testament. I especially hope to explore social and cultural concerns from which the texts originated as well as the social implications of the interpretation of those texts. I want to engage scholarly issues, but also address issues of interest for non-academics who always seem to ask the best questions. I am also interested in leaving my blog a little open-ended to generally focus on the interpretation of texts, be they sacred, scholarly, or popular. I hope my Anabaptism biases me just enough to make this blog interesting, but not quite so much to make me an ideologue. If you’d like to send me infuriated emails, toss them on over here. Positive and encouraging feedback, of course, would also be welcome.
“The Levites . . . instructed the people in the Torah while the people were standing there. They read from the Book of the Torah of God, making it clear and giving the meaning so that the people could understand what was being read.” (Neh 8:7-8)




