kata ta biblia

a blog exploring Christian origins, biblical studies, social/cultural history, method, education and the journey through academia

Category: news

College students aren't all losing their religion

Inside Higher Ed today reports on a study that while many students drop in their attendance to religious services, very few actually say that religion is less important to them or disassociate with their religion.

The more you pursue a higher education, the more likely you are to abandon your faith — at least that’s what conventional wisdom holds.

“Actually we’ve just been wrong about this for quite a while,” said Mark D. Regnerus, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Texas at Austin and one of the authors of a new study that suggests students who attend and graduate from college are more likely than others to hold on to their faith.

It’s not that colleges necessarily encourage faith, he said, but for all the talk about how intellectuals are out to destroy students’ relationships to their religions and God, the main obstacles to such relationships have to do with maturing and how young people spend their time. “Some kids were bound to lose [their faith] anyway and they do,” Regnerus said. But the evidence suggests that college isn’t responsible.

[ . . . ]

Regnerus said that what the study suggests — and his personal experience confirms — is that while there are plenty of non-religious professors around, they aren’t trying to discourage any students from practicing their faith. “Of course there are some who are hostile to religion. But they don’t teach that. They teach their discipline,” Regnerus said. The attitude, he added, is: “Whatever I think about evangelicals, when I go to teach quantum physics, I teach quantum physics.”

One hopes that conservative pastors and communities of faith around the country will hear the good news, rejoice, and stop discouraging their flock regarding higher education! Alas, I suspect it is not the end for the niche of books (or articles) written for Christian graduating high school seniors on how to keep the faith while going off to a godless college campus. One interesting title I just saw on Amazon is University of Destruction: Your Game Plan for Spiritual Victory on Campus by David Wheaton. What is one trying to conquer at the University of Destruction? The book’s description reads in part, “Relating his own experiences at Stanford, David Wheaton describes the three Pillars of Peril you will face in college–sex, drugs/alcohol, and humanism–and presents a game plan for victory over these pitfalls based on raising your spiritual GPA.” One Amazon reviewer says: “You know that a book is solid when both Sean Hannity and Dr. John MacArthur recommend it.” Indeed.

One of the interesting things here is the tension between the Christian fundamentalism of the past (though, I know this study is for “religions” and not just Christianity) and the fundamentalism that has been developing for a few decades now. Traditional fundamentalism is separated from society, but with the help of Jerry Falwell and others, fundamentalism has learned to try to engage culture. To engage culture, it helps to have a quality education. To get a quality education, one must triumph over the liberal, secular propagandist professors bent on demolishing faith (because we all know that the perils of humanism are right up there with sex, drugs, and alcohol). Well, if this study is of any use, it appears that the battle is not so dire, at least not in the classroom. The article does report, however, that behavior has a part to play:

Behavioral factors, he said, are a better way than college status to predict whether young adults will become less religious. Those who don’t have sex before marriage are also those who don’t experience as much of a drop in religious connection. Those who have smoked pot experience more of a drop. Those who increase alcohol consumption during their young adulthood experience more of a drop in religious connection.

Those who blame college for declining religious activity by students don’t understand that it is these factors, among others, that are the influence, Regnerus said. “This is about this period of the life course where freedom and choice become paramount,” he said. “What diminishes religiosity is freedom and choice, not intellectual engagement.”

I suppose that bit about having premarital sex, smoking pot, and consuming alcohol may trigger the aforementioned books and articles. On the other hand, these things seem to be simply indicators, “symptoms,” if you will. A Christian who believes that consuming alcohol is sinful will not lose their faith after consuming alcohol, but if they drink, they are probably already questioning their faith and that has led them to consume alcohol (perhaps in rebellion).

Christian young adults, and I imagine this is true for other religions, need to know why something is “perilous.” Losing your faith should not be the only reason that something is perilous. Perhaps one steers clear of alcohol (either excessive drinking or drinking all together) because one has seen the effects of alcoholism in his or her family. College is the perfect opportunity to question the reasons for positions on morality, and for students to wonder whether their faith “makes sense” to them. That is scary, I suppose, for religious parents, but young adults either need to figure it out for themselves or, I think, they will toss it aside.

Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Google Buzz Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Chris Spinks is off to Wipf & Stock

Chris Spinks, with whom I share Fuller, our Mennonite church, and biblioblogging, is moving on to Eugene, OR, and the next stage in his life as an editor with Wipf & Stock. Here is the press release from Wipf & Stock:

Chris Spinks and his wife Gail move to the Pacific Northwest in June where Chris will begin working as an editor for Wipf and Stock.

Chris is a 2006 graduate of Fuller Theological Seminary, where he received his Ph.D. in New Testament. His dissertation focused on the hermeneutical concept of “meaning” in current proposals for “theological interpretation”. Prior to Fuller, Chris graduated from Baylor University with a B.A. in Speech Communications, and George W. Truett Theological Seminary with an M.Div. in Theology. Chris has been a part of academia for the last nine years in various roles. His most recent professional experience has been as an administrative assistant in Fuller’s School of Theology, where he has also been an adjunct professor of Greek, NT Exegesis and Orientation to Theological Studies for the last six years. His ongoing research interests include theological hermeneutics, philosophy of language and communitarian approaches to NT texts. Chris has been married to Gail, a psychotherapist, for nearly four years.

My public kudos to Chris! And to Gail, who snagged a good job up there too. That’s not to mention my total envy for the fact that they’ll be living in the beautiful Northwest.

(HT: Chris himself)

Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Google Buzz Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Richard T. Hughes defends Messiah (and Christian colleges in general)

Finally, some good press! I’ve blogged a couple times about the bad (and misrepresenting) press that Messiah College has gotten in the wake of the firings under the Attorney General, since Monica Goodling is an alumna of the school (as well as Regent University) [see my posts here and here]. It is an opinion piece written in the Philadelphia Inquirer and comes from a new faculty addition to Messiah College: Richard T. Hughes.

Here’s the article: “Christian colleges: A richly diverse group.”

Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Google Buzz Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

TCU Prof Accused of Making "Terroristic Threats"

Disturbing news from Inside Higher Ed about a prof at Texas Christian University:

Charles F. Bond Jr., 53, was arrested at his home on Saturday by Fort Worth Police after officers received a warrant by TCU Police detailing charges against the professor. A statement from the university says that Bond “exhibited extremely inappropriate conduct and made threatening remarks to some campus members.”

[ . . . ]

According to police reports, Bond hinted in an e-mail about bringing a submachine gun on campus. An arrest warrant affidavit cited by The Dallas Morning News said that Bond sent out harassing e-mail messages to a number of university employees last month, and made a statement saying he would spit in a colleague’s face. TCU officials would not confirm that those allegedly targeted were employees, nor would they expand on the nature of the alleged threats.

According to the affidavit, TCU already was investigating Bond and had asked him to stop communications with anyone at the university. When TCU officials requested that Bond meet with them, he refused, according to the affidavit. Then, last week, he allegedly sent an e-mail stating: “Is it possible a sexist could snap and bring an ouzi [sic] gun on the TCU campus? Might he target young women? Might others get in the way?”

Bond’s lawyers said that Bond “has had some health issues lately that may have hampered his ability to effectively communicate his message, and perhaps he was misinterpreted.” Patrick J. McLain, one of the lawyers, said the case “bears little to no resemblance to the Cho case at Virginia Tech.”

Bond has taught at TCU for more than 20 years. According to his university Web page, he specializes in quantitative psychology and social psychology, with a research emphasis on deception, which he says has drawn interest from the FBI and CIA.

Bond taught a fall course called “The Truth About Lies,” which, according to the syllabus, focused on the psychology of human deception.

Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Google Buzz Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

David Scholer makes LA Times front page


Were it not for this man, my Fuller Seminary experience would be vastly different. I do not even want to imagine it. Thus far, I have learned from Dr. Scholer not only information and theories about the New Testament, early Christianity, and women’s roles in all of the above, but I have also gleaned the necessary conviction for a gracious spirit in scholarly discussion. He is both progressive and kindly compassionate. For those who don’t know, David Scholer has colorectal cancer, which has spread to both lungs. He has outlived all expectations, and he does so with smiles, laughter, and generosity. As for me, I look forward to diving into the Greek text of Revelation with him in his class on it this Fall. Keep praying for him; he is a blessing.

Catch the article here.

Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Google Buzz Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Diplomas Denied Over Graduation Cheers

This story gives new meaning to “visiting the iniquity of the parents upon the children” (Ex 34:7)

;)

Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Google Buzz Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Messiah College on The Daily Show: More Goodling

I noticed that someone reached my blog by searching for “daily show messiah college.” I was away this weekend, so I hadn’t watched the latest from Stewart’s Daily Show online. When I looked it up, I found that it was in relation to Monica Goodling, who is unfortunately bringing Messiah’s name into the news for all the wrong reasons (not to mention how awfully misconstrued the bad press has been). Stewart’s line:

Here she is swearing in on the Bible, which is kind of redundant for a graduate of both Pat Robertson’s Regent University Law School and place called [pause] ‘Messiah College’ [audience laughter], which everyone in the God business knows is a [pause] ‘savior school.’ [Shakes his head and mouths 'No, just kidding' or something to that effect]

I think that last line was meant to be a play on the old bit of calling some university a “party school.” It’s sad that the mere name of the school conjures up laughter. Once I wore my Messiah College sweatshirt on a dress-down Friday at my job in Seattle. Someone asked me: “Is that a real school?” Yes. That is a real school. And a good one at that. To be honest, I’m not sure the school’s name is the best. There was a rumor that it might be changed awhile back and a whole ton of students, alums, and doners raised a fuss. In the end, though, if Messiah had changed it’s name, it would’ve just added a couple more words to Stewart’s line: “a place that used to be called ‘Messiah College.’”

As an aside, I mention that this last comment I received was in Seattle because Messiah has a firm reputation in its geographical region of Central PA. Outside of PA, it’s known amongst those who know about Christian colleges, but not the general public so much. That’s why we have to set the record straight here.

For those wondering about this Monica Goodling and Messiah College business, please see my earlier post about Messiah College’s bad press lately or, if you’re interested, you can see how Messiah has responded to the issue of homosexuality with a genuine openness to dialogue. Here is the Daily Show clip, which originally aired 5/24/07, from the source itself:

I do have to admit that I thought the “rosebud” line was hilarious, but I am still disappointed that Stewart would go for the easy laugh line in my alma mater’s name, while tossing its solid credentials to the side.

Update (same day): Someone told me another interpretation of the “savior school” thing. They thought it was a replacement for “safety school,” as in it’s a “safe bet” that you’d get accepted. That might make more sense of his shake-of-the-head brush off afterwards. Whatever it meant, it was a bad joke anyhow. A lot of the time the show is funny (to me anyway), but sometimes they just have bad jokes.

Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Google Buzz Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

In Memoriam: Jerry Falwell

For those who haven’t heard the news, and I’m sure within a short period of time everybody who reads this will have heard, Jerry Falwell died today at 73. With such a controversial public figure, I can’t even begin to imagine the great variety of reflections there will be with his passing. Someone from my church (Pasadena Mennonite Church), though, has shared an impressive reflection on our church listserve. John Harris wrote this wonderful piece in memory of Falwell, capturing the inner conflict of many progressive Christians: a shared faith with the religious right, but much shared ideology with the secular left. It is with his permission that I share it here.

Today a great Christian and political leader has passed away. Jerry Falwell has died at age 73, still working as a pastor. He died in his office. He was the pastor of Thomas Road Baptist Church and chancellor of Liberty University.

I grew up watching Jerry on television with my family. A vinyl record was among our collection of sermons and gospel music. He has been ever-present in my life as both a Christian and a human rights worker. Although young at the time, my first impressions of him were that he was the only person on television to take the time to have an interpreter for the blind during the broadcasts of his church services. I remember him as dignified and sure that Jesus was the Christ that loved us and wanted to come into our hearts.

He, more than any other person, brought the issue of abortion to the political table of the American Christian community. His passion for this and other issues remain deep within my soul. He showed us that organizing Christians could have a huge impact on our political landscape.

The church he pastored, Thomas Road Baptist, has the highest amount of contributions to crisis pregnancy centers than any other church in America. Their actions matched their words.

In my travels, I have met a number of people from Liberty University and Thomas Road Baptist. They were of the highest caliber of Christians I know. They were friendly, caring, genuine Christian people. Their lives had been transformed by the work of God in their lives. I would trust them with my life and the lives of the children in my neighborhood.

The politics of Jerry Falwell were almost always opposite of mine. I have struggled throughout my adult life to counteract the influence that The Moral Majority and similar conservative groups have had on the Christian church, the nation, and the world. My activities related to the free trade movement, militarism and the Iraq wars, and especially apartheid in South Africa have all collided with Jerry and his influence on us. Especially while living in South Africa during the mid 1990s, I saw the negative effects of his refusal to support the movement of the African National Congress (ANC) for a democratic South Africa, and his support instead for the Inkatha Freedom Party, a black African group spearheaded by a demagogue, funded by the right-winged and racist Conservative Party, and responsible for the division of the black voice against apartheid, all because of Cold War politics of the left and right. In doing this, he refused to support US limited sanctions against South Africa. President Ronald Reagan’s veto of a sanctions bill was the only case in which the US Congress overrode his veto. If Jerry and Ronald had had it their way, the US outcry against apartheid in South Africa would have been extremely limited.

It is a surprise to some of my friends, then, while discussing religion and politics, that my comments on Falwell’s religion have always been positive. I have always considered the political worldview of, say, a twentysomething secular anarchist to be closer to my understanding of my own Christian worldview than that of Jerry’s. When put to the question of who I identify with more, the secular anarchist or Jerry Falwell, I have always responded that I identify more with Jerry because we are both Christians who have submitted ourselves to the radical love and grace of Jesus Christ, our Lord and savior.

Goodbye, Jerry. You have taught us well. You have taught us that organizing the Christian church can elect President. You remind us that the issue of abortion is close to the heart of God. You show us that a living and loving God wants to bless us with radical grace and forgiveness. While we will miss you, you are now blessed by being in the presence of God for all eternity.

Update (05/15/07): I’d also like to point to a nice reflection done by Joel Willitts over on Euangelion, who attended Liberty as an undergrad, but, as he says, “share[s] neither the fundamentalism nor the right-wing republicanism of Falwell and the University.”

Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Google Buzz Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

Herod's tomb found!

Big news from Hebrew University. First Jesus now Herod the Great ;)

Update (05/08/07): There are a lot of posts coming out about Herod’s tomb, and I don’t plan on reflecting on it in depth on this blog, but I would like to highlight Kevin Wilson’s post about its significance, especially for those who are not Bible/Early-Judaism Geeks.

By the way, my original comment above was tongue in cheek. These are totally different kinds of archaeological finds with different implications. It’s just funny that they have been made public in such a short period of time. Maybe we’re in the end times. Are there any Scriptures about significant tombs being dug up as we near the coming judgment?

Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Google Buzz Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon

College presidents plan 'U.S. News' rankings boycott

This Christian Science Monitor article is interesting food for thought. I don’t think that the US News rankings would be my own personal ranking system, but on the other hand, there is certainly a “top tier” of schools. For many of the schools in the top tier, I’m not sure it matters whether you go to, say, #8 instead of #6. It depends on what you’re looking for in a school. And the big, choosier schools will not necessarily get you a better education either. I went to a smaller school and got mentoring attention from my professors that I never would have gotten at the really big schools. But then, the top tier schools give you this flashy school name on your resume. That there is brand name flashiness (perhaps where not always deserved) is not the fault of US News rankings. That’s just how our system works. So I’m mixed about the rankings. As long as they’re taken with a grain of salt, not much harm done. It’d be interesting to see how they would rank Religion programs, which I’ve never seen them do.

Update (05/07/07): See also this article released today by Inside Higher Ed.

Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Google Buzz Post to LinkedIn Post to StumbleUpon